Today’s early childhood leaders face a crowded, often confusing field of early intervention options. Structures differ, and outcomes vary. And the quality of evidence behind each approach is not the same.
In this context, choosing the best early intervention becomes less about following trends and more about finding the right fit for your staff and the children and families you serve. Doing so requires clear, practical criteria that move teams from what sounds promising to what will actually work.
This blog offers a framework to help you confidently compare options and select the best early interventions for your organization.
What are the top goals of your organization? Before comparing models or reviewing evidence, leaders need to define the scope of what they are trying to change.
Needs and Goals should be named plainly. For example, you might want to address:
When teams articulate these needs and goals, they move closer to identifying effective SEL evidence-based programs that address the challenges their communities face and target the outcomes they care about most.
Clarify who the intervention is really for. Some approaches focus on parents and strengthening daily routines and parenting skills. Others center on teachers and help them improve classroom management and instruction. Others work directly with children to build social–emotional learning through structured activities.
Each pathway matters. And the best early intervention programs are those that match your most pressing needs, not just your preferred format.
What population will your programs target? Universal prevention programs (to all parents, children, or teachers)? Selective prevention program (to high-risk populations, e.g., Head Start)? Indicated prevention program (to individuals who exhibit symptoms, e.g., children with aggressive behavior, depressed parents, foster parents, etc.)? Treatment (to diagnosed children, parents, or teachers working with children with diagnoses)?
What age of children/families will you target the program(s)?
The best early interventions are always grounded in developmental fit, because strategies that work for a two-year-old rarely translate to a second grader.
Incredible Years offers developmentally sequenced programs for parents, teachers, and children spanning infancy through the early grades that address child behavior, relationships, and SEL skills, and help parents and teachers build positive relationships.
Agencies can even pair approaches (such as combining a preschool parenting program grounded in evidence-based parenting strategies with a small-group child SEL program), so skills are reinforced at home and at school. Coordination is often what elevates promising ideas into the best early interventions that will deliver lasting impact.
Once you know who you want to serve and what challenges you aim to address, the next question is simple. Does the evidence actually support it? Many programs carry the “evidence-based” label, but not all evidence is created equal.
Leaders should look for a body of research that includes randomized controlled trials, independent replications across different settings, and findings published in peer-reviewed journals. Together, these markers signal reliable outcomes.
It is essential to consider the relevance of an intervention’s outcomes. A program may be well studied yet focuses on outcomes that don’t fully align with your goals.
If you are prioritizing building parenting skills, reductions in child disruptive behavior, gains in social–emotional skills, or stronger classroom functioning, the research should speak directly to those results. Choosing the best early interventions means asking not only, “Does it work?” but “Does it work for what we need?”
The advantage of Incredible Years is that we offer decades of rigorous research demonstrating improvements in parenting skills, child behavior, social–emotional development, teacher classroom management, and stronger parent–child relationships grounded in evidence-based parenting approaches.
These outcomes have been replicated across settings and populations, giving leaders confidence that results are not limited to a single study or context. The best early interventions deliver these kinds of results.
Substantial evidence also supports accountability. Funders, boards, and community partners increasingly expect transparency about why a model was selected and what outcomes it can deliver.
When decisions are grounded in well-defined research, agencies can clearly justify their investments in the best early interventions and show how those choices contribute to effective evidence-based SEL programs and long-term impact.
Check out this interactive, decision-making worksheet your organization can use to help guide your selection process.
Individual teachers and clinicians may perceive a definite need to offer an evidence-based program, but without administrative support, it is more difficult to successfully implement these programs. Likewise, administrators may want to deliver these programs, but they will only succeed if the teachers and clinicians are motivated and interested in learning and delivering the programs. Consequently, it is important that all parties work together to understand what will be required to initiate any of these programs.
Operational fit is equally important. Start by identifying who will lead the work.
It is recommended that organizations carefully select individuals to offer these programs based on their interpersonal skills, background education, experience, respect from peers, and motivation to implement the program. Individuals introducing innovation into an organization must be prepared and excited about being an agent of change, which involves the characteristics of being flexible, enthusiastic, supportive to others, willing to take the necessary time to learn a new program and committed to quality. Compare Intervention Formats and Time Demands
Some parenting programs are delivered in a 1-to-1 model, while others are group-based. Some child SEL programs rely on whole-class lessons embedded into the school day. Others use targeted small groups for children who need extra support. And others focus on educator skill-building. Some are a brief intervention aimed at a universal population, while others require more time to implement.
Each model carries different demands on time, space, and staffing. Understanding what is needed to implement an evidence-based program with fidelity will help ensure that the program is implemented consistently with high-quality.
Training and support should be part of the conversation from the start. Be honest about your team’s capacity.
Incredible Years offers standardized training, consultation, and ongoing guidance that fit naturally into established systems and help teams build confidence over time, and support fidelity implementation to help ensure outcomes similar to those found in our published research.
Choosing the best early interventions is both a strategic decision and a practical one. It starts by clearly defining the population you serve, the settings in which you work, and the challenges you face every day. Take a careful look at the evidence and assess whether the research is strong and aligned with your goals.
Programs like Incredible Years illustrate how research, developmental alignment, and structured training and fidelity support can come together in one cohesive approach. Learn how to bring an Incredible Years program to your organization today.
Incredible Years is dedicated to providing evidence-based programs designed to aid early interventions for children in order to improve their emotional and social competencies, focusing on equipping parents, caregivers, and teachers with necessary strategies and support. Our unique approach is designed to address each child's individual needs and help them thrive. For more information about our programs and how they can help you by visiting our Programs page.
Categories: Uncategorized | Permalink.